Header Ads Widget

Responsive Advertisement

Problem Identification and Hypothesis Formulation in Research

Introduction

The term "identification of research problem" refers to the knowledge of a persistent social issue, a social phenomenon, or a notion that merits investigation in order to be understood. Such a study problem is discovered by the researcher by observation, knowledge, wisdom, and abilities.

Finding a subject to study can be difficult, not because there aren't any problems that could be researched, but because it can be difficult to formulate a problem that is both academically important and researchable and that is also original and doesn't just repeat previous research. Consider these sources of inspiration to help you decide on a problem to base your research project around.



Deductions from Theory

This relates to deductions from social philosophy or generalizations that the researcher is familiar with in life and society. Through research, these deductions from human behavior are then placed within an empirical frame of reference. A theory can be used to develop a research problem or hypothesis that states the expected results in specific empirical situations. The study asks that what relationship between variables will be observed if theory accurately summarizes the situation. Thus, the hypothesis or a theory, can then be tested using a systematic investigation.

Perspectives from Various Disciplines

Identifying a problem that will serve as the foundation for a research study can come from academic movements and scholarship that originate in disciplines other than your primary field of study. This can be a mentally stimulating activity. Examining research from related disciplines that can reveal new avenues of exploration and analysis should be included in a review of relevant literature. An interdisciplinary approach to selecting a research problem allows for a more comprehensive understanding of a very complex issue than any single discipline could provide.

Practitioner Interviews

Formal interviews or informal discussions with practitioners who provide insight into new directions for future research and how to make research findings more relevant to practice can lead to the identification of research problems about specific topics. Discussions with experts in the field, such as teachers, social workers, health care providers, lawyers, business leaders, and so on, provide an opportunity to identify practical, "real world" issues which is often ignored within academic circles. This approach also provides some practical knowledge that may aid in the design and execution of your study.

Related Literature

A thorough review of relevant research related to your overall area of interest can help you choose a research problem. This may reveal where there are gaps in understanding or where an issue has been understudied. Research may be conducted to: 1) fill such knowledge gaps; 2) assess whether the methodologies used in previous studies can be adapted to solve other problems; or 3) determine whether a similar study could be conducted in a different subject area, in a different context, or with a different study sample.

(Identification of Problem)

Formulation of Research Questions/ Statement

A strong problem statement starts by outlining the broad topic on which your study is focused before guiding the reader toward the more specific problems you are looking into. A good research problem should have the following characteristics, albeit it need not be long:

1. Captivating Subject

The problem you choose should be one that inspires you to solve it; nevertheless, pursuing a research project out of mere curiosity is not recommended as this does not suggest significance. The issue you decide to research must matter to you, but it must also matter to your readers and the greater academic and/or social community that might be affected by the findings of your investigation.

2. Accepts Multiple Points of View

The issue must be phrased in a way that avoids dichotomies and instead encourages the generation and exploration of multiple points of view. A general rule of thumb in the social sciences is that a good research problem is one that will elicit a wide range of opinions from a diverse group of reasonable people.

3. Research ability

Research ability is an important aspect of creating a good research statement. It seems a smidgen obvious, but you don't want to find yourself in the middle of investigating a complex research project and realize that it is not necessary much prior research to draw from for the analysis. There's nothing wrong with original research, but as a researcher you certainly need to select the problems of research is supposed to be able in supporting, to some extent, the resources available to the researcher.

Analytical questions that are well-developed can focus on any of the following:

Draws attention to a genuine quandary, area of ambiguity, or point of confusion about a topic that is open to interpretation by your readers;

It gives birth to an answer that is unexpected and not apparent slightly but is inevitable and self-evident;

Provokes meaningful thought or discussion;

Increases the visibility of key ideas or concepts that may be understudied or hidden;

Research ability helps in providing the suggestions to the need for complex analysis or argument rather than a basic description or summary;

Process of Problem Identification in Research

The process is illustrated in the following diagram.

(Process of Problem Identification)


Features of a research questions

The research question should be feasible that is to say adequate number of subjects, adequate technical expertise, affordable in time and money, manageable in scope.

It should be interesting: Getting the answer intrigues the investigator and her friends.

It should be novel: Confirms, refutes or extends previous findings, provides new findings.

It should be ethical: Amenable to a study that institutional review board will approve.

It should be relevant: to scientific, knowledge, to clinical and health policy and to future research.

Definitions of Hypothesis

Etymologically speaking, hypothesis is made up of two words. Here, 'Hypo' means  an assumption or tentative or subject to verification, and 'Thesis' means a statement about a problem's solution i.e. a tentative thesis waited to be tested. The definition of hypothesis is a tentative statement about how to solve a problem. The simplest definition of hypothesis is "It is a solution to a problem that is empirically and rationally verifiable. In another word it is also defined as a hypothesis is made up of two words - 'Hypo' means a combination of two or more variables that must be verified. The term 'thesis' refers to the position of these variables in a specific frame of reference. The term hypothesis has this operational meaning.

In a more comprehensive way, a hypothesis is an educated guess about the relationship between two or more variables. A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction/guess about what will happen in the upcoming research. The basic requirement is the hypothesis must include three components in order to be complete: the variables, the population, and the relationship between the variables. Keep in mind that a hypothesis does not have to be correct. The hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, but the goal of research is to determine whether this guess is correct or incorrect.

What is an Assumption and Postulate? How are they related to hypothesis?

Assumption is the act of taking something for granted in order to simplify a situation for logical procedure. Assumptions, unlike postulates, are not the foundation of our activity. They merely facilitate the progression of an agreement by introducing restrictive conditions. Statistics and measurement formulas, for example, are based on a number of assumptions. Assumption refers to the requirement of certain conditions before an argument can be considered valid. Assumptions are made based on logical insight, and their veracity can be determined using data or evidence. The postulates are the foundation and starting point of an argument, whereas assumptions are a matter of choice and less use, giving them more freedom.

Postulates are the fundamental beliefs that strengthen most scientific activity. A postulate is a statement that is assumed to be true without any kind of proof. A postulate is an assumption we make about the relationship of two objects. For example, we could assert that a+b = b+a. This simply states that if we combine two objects, a and b, the order in which they are combined has no effect on the outcome. Other statements, known as theorems, are derived through logical deductions. We are entirely within the realm of ideas, from postulates to theorems. It is pointless to demand experimental proof of deductions. A request of this nature would be meaningless. The only appropriate appeal for proof is entirely within the realm of logic.

A hypothesis is not the same as either of these. The investigator seeks to prove a presumptive statement of a proposition. It's a shortened generalization. This generalization necessitates knowledge of fundamental principles or essential characteristics that apply to an entire class of phenomena. The theory is known as a hypothesis when it is stated formally and clearly as a testable proposition and is subjected to empirical or experimental verification. The hypothesis serves as the foundation for the entire investigation and must be validated by facts. The hypothesis is founded on some prior theory and reasoning, whereas postulates are assumed to be true. An assumption is a major problem's assumed solution. It could be partially correct.

What is the actual nature of a hypothesis?

The hypothesis is a concise statement of what will be investigated. It should be specified prior to conducting research and openly stated in the results report.

a.       This allows you to - Identify... the research objectives;

b.      The key abstract concepts involved in the research;

c.       The relationship between the problem statement and the literature review.

What are the main features of a hypothesis?

The major and common features of a hypothesis can be listed as follows

a.       It is of a conceptual nature.

b.      It is a declarative statement made verbally.

c.       It possesses the empirical referent.

d.      It denotes a possible relationship between two or more variables.

e.       It is a powerful tool for knowledge advancement that is consistent with existing knowledge and conducive to further investigation.

f.       It is testable, verifiable, and falsifiable.

g.      It is not a moral or ethical issue.

h.      It's neither too specific nor too broad.

i.        It is a prediction of outcomes.

j.        Even if proven false, it is considered valuable.

What are the roles and functions of hypothesis?

In empirical or socio-legal research, a hypothesis, which is a provisional formulation, plays an important role. It not only guides research in the right direction, but it also helps to test or suggest theories and describe a social or legal phenomenon. The roles and functions of a hypothesis can be listed as follows:

The role of hypothesis in research navigation

A hypothesis, regardless of its source, expresses what a researcher is looking for. It also offers some plausible explanations for the possible relationships between the concepts or variables mentioned. In fact, it guides you through the research. Without it, no further steps in empirical or non-doctrinal legal research are possible. A hypothesis assists the researcher in reaching "meaningful conclusions" based on "relevant" empirical data.

A hypothesis becomes supportive and helps the researcher in many respects such as it gives the idea to the type of data that must be collected in order to answer the research problem. In the same line it provides the ways to the most efficient and meaningful way to organize the data; and helps in deciding the types of methods that can be used to analyze the data.

The role of the 'tested' hypothesis: In order to draw conclusions about the initially posited relationship between the variables indicated in the hypothesis, it must be empirically tested. As a result, when empirically tested (or not), the previously assumed relationship between concepts or variables, as the case may be, becomes a proven fact. Once a hypothesis is proven, it is no longer a hypothesis.

A hypothesis, even if related to an existing theory, may, when tested, reveal certain 'facts' that are not related to the existing theory or reveal relationships other than those stated in the theory. It does not support the existing theory but rather proposes a new one.

A hypothesis can also be used to describe something. When a hypothesis is empirically tested, it tells us something about the phenomenon with which it is associated. If the hypothesis is empirically supported, our understanding of the phenomenon grows.

The hypotheses functions a significant role mainly in the scientific studies.

For example

·         It helps in the testing of the theories.

·         It serves as a great platform in the investigation activities.

·         It provides guidance to the research work or study.

·         It sometimes also suggests the theories.

·         It aids in understanding the data's requirements.

·         Explains social phenomena and advances the theory.

·         Also serves as a link between theory and investigation.

·         Provides a relationship between phenomena in such a way that empirical testing of the relationship is possible.

·         Aids in determining the most appropriate analysis technique.

·         Aids in the selection of the most appropriate type of research.

·         Provides information on the necessary data sources.

·         Under the guidance of the hypothesis, research becomes more focused.

·         It is extremely useful in conducting an investigation into a specific activity.

·         If correctly drawn, it aids in reaching conclusions.

According to Mac Ashan the hypothesis in research has mainly five functions:

1. It is a temporary solution of a problem concerning with some truth which enables an investigator to start his/her research works.

2. It offers a basis in establishing the specifics what to study for and may provide possible solutions to the problem.

3. Each hypothesis may lead to formulate another hypothesis.

4. A preliminary hypothesis may take the shape of final hypothesis.

5. It provides the investigator with definite statement which may be objectively tested and accepted or rejected and leads for interpreting results and drawing conclusions that is related to original purpose.

Importance of Hypothesis

The importance of hypothesis is understood as the eye of the researcher because it actually opens the vision to the researcher.

The main importance of hypothesis is to focus on the research.

Hypothesis helps in linking the similar facts, ideas and opinion together.

There is always a risk that without proper hypothesis, the researcher may go ahead as a blind man on the way.

Hypothesis simply plays a beautiful role like a guiding light in the entire research process.

 Characteristics of a good hypothesis

A good hypothesis should possess the various features as follows:

It is as in statement form but not in a question form.

It may be right or wrong but should be empirically tested.

It should be specific and precise.

It should not be contradictory.

It clearly mentions the independent and dependent variables which are to be compared.

It should deal with only one issue either in descriptive form or relational form.

According to C R Kothari & Gaurav  Garg (2019) the brief introduction and characteristics of research hypothesis as follows:

Research hypothesis is a predictive statement, capable of being tested by scientific methods, that relates an independent variable to some dependent variables.

For example

Students who receive counseling will show a greater increase in creativity than students not receiving counseling.

Or

The automobiles A is performing as well as automobile B.

The basic characteristics of hypothesis are:

Hypothesis should be clear and precise.

Hypothesis should be capable of being tested.

Hypothesis should state relationship between variables.

Hypothesis should be limited in its scope.

Hypothesis should be consistent with most known facts.

Hypothesis must explain the facts that gave rise to the need for explanation.

Ranjit Kumar (2014) in his book Research Methodology A step-by-step guide for beginners has mentioned that a hypothesis construction is the second important consideration in the formulation of a research problem in quantitative research. He further says, in epidemiological studies, to narrow the field of investigation, it is important to formulated hypotheses. The importance of hypotheses lies in their ability to bring direction, specificity and focus to a research study.

A hypothesis is a hunch, assumption, suspicion, assertion or an idea about a phenomenon, relationship or situation, the reality or truth of which you do not know.

H.K. Dangi and Shruti Dewen (2016) in their book entitled 'Business Research Methods' clearly distinguish the concept of propositions and hypothesis. Propositions are statements that define the relationships amongst the concepts. Prepositions can be judged as true or false if they are related to observable phenomena. Once a proposition can be tested for its validity then it is called a hypothesis.

Hypothesis are formulated to be tested. Hypothesis testing is a process of testing a hypothesis about a parameter of a population. Hypothesis testing involves checking the likelihood of claims regarding the population being true.

The steps of hypothesis testing according to them are illustrated as in the following diagram.

(Steps of Hypothesis Testing)
Types of Hypothesis

The common types of hypothesis are null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis/research hypothesis. The null means there is no effect/impact/relation/difference between the independent variable and dependent variable whereas alternate hypothesis is also called research hypothesis. In alternate hypothesis the researcher sees or assumes the impact/effect/relation/difference between or among the independent and dependent variables.

The null hypothesis is indicated by H0 whereas alternate hypothesis is indicated by H1.

The idea of null and alternate hypothesis can be beautifully illustrated with the following examples.

H0: There is no relationship between working conditions and job satisfaction of employees.

H1: Increasing the improvement in job quality will improve the job satisfaction.

H0: There is no difference in educational level of employee to their work performance in an organization.

H1: Higher educational qualification contributes high level of work performance in an organization.

H0: There is no relation between earning and saving.

H1: Earning and saving are positively related.

Some Scholars also have classified hypothesis into simple, complex, directional, non-directional, associative, causal, inductive and deductive as well.

Simple Hypothesis

Simple hypothesis is one which deals with the only one independent variable to one dependent variable there is a direct relation or impact between them. For example The impact of education in work performance.

Complex Hypothesis

Complex hypothesis purposes and predicts the relation between two or more independent variables and two or more dependent variables. It is called complex in the sense that there is not direct and one to one relation or impact between them. For example, The training and hard work (IV) have positive impacts on individual growth as well as the goodwill of organization (DV).

Directional Hypothesis

It predicts the outcome or impact is as intellectually directed. The effect or impact or relationship between two variables into a specified direction. The researcher not only predicts the relationship but also the nature of the relation i.e. the direction. For example, Discipline as well as rules and regulation has negative relation to the creative outcome among the students.

Non-directional Hypothesis

This hypothesis predicts the relation between two variables but the nature and direction of relationship is not specified. For example 'There is a relationship between discipline and creative outcome of the school children'.

Associative Hypothesis

There is relationship between Independent Variable (IV) and Dependent Variable (DV) where when one variable changes there is the change in another variable but it is not in case of cause and effect.

Inductive and Deductive Variable

These both inductive and deductive are based on a particular type of reasoning if the hypothesis is based on deduction it is called deductive and in the same way when the researcher goes from one specific to theory then it is called as inductive variable. In this way, inductive hypotheses are formed through inductively reasoning from many specific observations to tentative explanations. The deductive one is generated through deductive reasoning based on implications of theory.

Null Hypothesis

This is a hypothesis purposes that there is no relationship or difference i.e. relationship is null between two variables. This is the conventional approach to making a prediction. It involves a statement that the researcher compares on a certain variable. The hypothesis may also state that there is no significant difference when different groups/sets are compared accordance to a specified variable. For example, ‘There is no difference in the job performance of commercial bank's employees who participate in motivational classes and those who do not participate in such classes’ is a null hypothesis. It asserts that there is no true difference in the sample statistic and population parameter under consideration and that the difference found is accidental arising out of fluctuations of sampling.

Alternative/ Research Hypothesis

As opposite to null hypothesis, research hypothesis assumes, predicts and expects the relation between independent and dependent variables.

The alternative hypothesis is a statement of what a hypothesis test attempts to establish. Alternative hypothesis is designated by: H1 or Ha. It is opposite of Null Hypothesis. It is only reached if Ha is rejected.  Frequently “alternative” is actual desired conclusion of the researcher.

It is important to see the following formula and example to comprehend the context and situation of hypothesis in relation to null/alternative.

Ha= the males go for eating out than females.

Ho= the males and females do not differ in respect of the frequency of eating out. So, Alternative hypothesis is usually the one which one wishes to prove and the Null hypothesis is the one which one wishes to disapprove.

Conclusion

Problem identification and hypothesis formulation in research has a significant role. This is one of the important aspect or step of the entire research process. The researcher has to do the literature review based on his/her need, interest and ability that in which areas/topic are dealt. It is not an overnight job to identify the research problem as well as formulation of hypothesis. If the process of problem identification and hypothesis formulation is systematic and objective then the entire research process and activities go to the specified direction.


References

Timilsena (2022). A platform for discussion to University Students- Business Research Methodology

Kumar, R (2014). Research Methodology: A step by step guide for beginners- Sage

Cooper D, Schindler PS & Sharma JK (2014) Business Research Methods-Mc Graw Hill Education

Chawla D and Sondhi N (2018) Research Methodology: Concepts and Cases- Vikas

Dangi HK & Dewen Shruit (2016). Business Research Methods-Cengave

Flick, U (2011). Introducing Research Methodology-Sage

Pant PR (1975). Social Science Research and Thesis Writing


Related Article

1. Introduction to Business Research- Fundamentals of Research-Useful for MBA Students and Professionals
2. Report Writing: What, How & Why

Post a Comment

0 Comments